Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rowlands v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00757
Plaintiff:
Michael L Rowlands
Defendant:
Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. v. Kinder
as 1:2014cv00902
Plaintiff:
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy H. Kinder
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Timothy H. Kinder
Counterclaim_defendant:
Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Duran et al
as 1:2012cv02299
Plaintiff:
Lee J. Rowland
Defendant:
Tom Duran, Jacqueline Motter, Harkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisneros v. Lackawanna County (PA) Commissioners et al
as 3:2012cv01466
Plaintiff:
Sharon M Cisneros
Defendant:
Lackawanna County (PA) Commissioners, Jim Wansacz, Corey D. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisneros v. City of Carbondale et al
as 3:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Sharon M Cisneros
Defendant:
City of Carbondale, Joseph Pilcavage, Fred Colonna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Rowland et al
as 1:2011cv01684
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clayton A. Rowland and Delilah J. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Peet v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Peet and Lawrence J. Peet
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Then Acting Warden of the SCI Camp Hill, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
