Cases 1 - 10 of 284
Reynoso v. Greene
as 1:2024cv00967
Petitioner:
Yeffry Reynoso
Respondent:
J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Board of Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Petitioner:
Rahmee Green
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Parole, Superintendent SCI-Huntingdon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roldan v. Greene
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner:
Angel Roldan
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Neal Forte
Defendant:
City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mercedes v. Greene
as 1:2024cv00773
Petitioner:
Alex Rafael Hernandez Mercedes
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burr v. Warden of SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Dwain Burr
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Greene and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DePack, Jr. v. Green
as 1:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Roy John DePack, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden J. Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
