Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hoover et al v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
Corey Hoover and Sheri Lynn Hoover
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hoover et al v. Cleo AI , Inc.
as 3:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Karen Hoover, Tom Baker and Vera Beckford
Defendant:
Cleo AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Travillion v. Harry et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Salamon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lee Hoover
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jabbi v. City of Clinton County et al
as 4:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
Abdourahman Jabbi
Defendant:
City of Clinton County and Angela Hoover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Clinton County Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Kevin Milton
Defendant:
Clinton County Correctional Facility, Warden Angela Hoover and Lt. Raush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
