Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Brown et al v. Paris
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Taylor Brown, Shawn Palmer, Max Ness and others
Defendant:
Col. Christopher Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Spathelf et al
as 3:2023cv01640
Plaintiff:
David Mark Wilson
Defendant:
Lawrence Spathelf, Leland Palmere, Isaac Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Dolbin et al
as 3:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Brown and A. M. B.
Defendant:
Cyrus Palmer Dolbin, Mark A. Barket, Karen E. Rismiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fishback et al v. Crowne Plaza Hotel, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Christopher Fishback, James Palmer and Joseph Cristopher Fishback
Defendant:
Crowne Plaza Hotel, Inc., 23 S. 2nd Street, LLC and HHCP Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Shenk et al
as 3:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Warden Travis Shenk, Deputy Warden Michael Eickhoff, Corporal Hrnjic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Graham
as 1:2021cv01630
Plaintiff:
Sherry L. Palmer
Defendant:
Dameon D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. USA
as 1:2021cv01349
Petitioner:
Erik Palmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
