Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Jackson v. Walker Advertising, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Walker Advertising, LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Diaz et al v. Gelber et al
as 3:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Anthony Diaz and Janeane Diaz
Defendant:
Darren Gelber, Joshua Lowther, Murdoch Walker II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker v. Norfolk Southern Railway
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walker
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Sollenberger v. Varner et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Alan Sollenberger
Defendant:
D. Varner, Emily Walker, Robert Mariani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Prime Care et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Glay Kimble
Defendant:
Prime Care, Nurse Phillips, Nurse Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
Laura Walker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neff v. Penn. Legislators et al
as 4:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
Keith Neff
Defendant:
Penn. Legislators, Penn. Dept. of Corrections and Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abuhadba v. Walker, et al.
as 4:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
Mahmoud Abuhadba
Defendant:
Tina Walker, E. David Christine, Jr. and Michelle A. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
