Cases 51 - 60 of 107
PROCTOR v. BURKE et al
as 2:2013cv01284
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. PROCTOR
Defendant:
BURKE , HART , BEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZILKO v. UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
GALE P. ZILKO
Defendant:
UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMAS v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. THOMAS
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, STEVEN KELLER, CATHERINE MCVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SETHMAN v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. SETHMAN
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY , JOHN R. WALTON , WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
MCARDLE v. HUFNAGEL et al
as 1:2012cv00326
Defendant:
DANIEL F. CUSICK, JOHN DOE, ANNE M. MCARDLE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. MCARDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARIN v. FRAGEL et al
as 2:2012cv01676
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH FRAGEL, SHARON CITY, ROBERT LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
REESE v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv01667
Plaintiff:
EVELYN MARIE C. REESE
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, JEFFERY JOHN ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEC v. DISTRICT OF THIRD CIRCUIT
as 2:2012cv01591
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF THIRD CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SEMULKA v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
EDWARD P. SEMULKA
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA BAR ASSOCIATION, PA. STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEC v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE-TROOP D et al
as 2:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE-TROOP D, TROOPER JENKINS, TROOPER MIFSOB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
