Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BALDWIN TOWER vs. ACKERMAN
as 2:2019cv00134
Defendant:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Plaintiff:
BALDWIN TOWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
REESE et al v. JACOBOWITZ et al
as 2:2015cv01523
Plaintiff:
TAMARA REESE , JEREMY REESE and FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Defendant:
WILLIAM JACOBOWITZ , RIFKIE JACOBOWITZ and EARNEST MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. THE SALVATION ARMY OF JOHNSTOWN
as 3:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
THE SALVATION ARMY OF JOHNSTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
ACKERMAN v. OFFICE OF BEHAVIOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF BEHAVIOR HEALTH, JIM TURN and KIM WELSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ACKERMAN v. MERCY BEHAVIOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2012cv01807
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Defendant:
RAY WOLF and MERCY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SWANSON
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
SNYDER v. RMWS LIMITED et al
as 2:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
RMWS LIMITED, SCALISE CONSTRUCTION, INC., WILLIAM SCALISE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNYDER v. DAUGHERTY et al
as 2:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAUGHERTY , DAVID BERTOK , ROBERT RIZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKIVITZ et al v. TOWNSHIP OF STOWE et al
as 2:2008cv01247
Plaintiff:
JEANNE MCKIVITZ and ROBERT MCKIVITZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF STOWE, TOWNSHIP OF STOWE ZONING BOARD ADJUSTMENT and WILLIAM J. SAVATT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOPEZ et al v. CITY OF OIL CITY
as 1:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
MARGARET A. LOPEZ and WILLIAM DIDOMINIC
Defendant:
CITY OF OIL CITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
