Cases 1 - 10 of 1,390
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant:
STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRITTEN v. BRYAN-HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. CRITTEN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR LENA BRYAN-HENDERSON and PUBLIC DEFENDER ALEXA GRISTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLK v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
OMAR S. FOLK
Defendant:
BOP DIRECTOR COLETTE PETERS, NER DIRECTOR AMY BONCHER, NER COUNSEL DARRIN HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROBERT MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., ABBIE TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBINOSKI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
MISTER KENNETH RUBINOSKI
Defendant:
PA IG ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
