Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
KING v. HARMOTTA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00297
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. KING
Defendant: DIANE HARMOTTA, M. VEIL GRIFFITH and DOUGLAS LENGENFELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00294
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
PEOPLES v. PAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff: ODELL PEOPLES, JR.
Defendant: PAMS, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, HONORABLE RICHARD G. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01730
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ARENDOSH et al v. KING et al
as 2:2013cv01049
Plaintiff: BRIAN ARENDOSH , GERALDINE GEIBEL , DEBRA GAUS and others
Defendant: SHAWN E. KING , BRIAN BURKS , PAMELA VIVIRITO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00176
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
KING v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2012cv01679
Plaintiff: ROCHELLE KING
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00367
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?