Cases 41 - 50 of 64
WERKMEISTER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2015cv01069
Plaintiff:
TABATHA WERKMEISTER and GRINAGE DION WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, REGINA MCDONALD, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
HARVEY v. RENEWAL, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
SURINA HARVEY
Defendant:
RENEWAL, INC. , UNITED STATES PROBATION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2015cv00402
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MILLER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00288
Defendant:
THOMPSON, JOHN DOE #5, MR. MICHEAL LEFEBVRE and others
Plaintiff:
MILLER, CHERYL ANN MILLER and ROBERT STEVEN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CROCK v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. CROCK
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, PITT PD, TURACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLETT v. HARRINGTON et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WILLETT
Defendant:
JAMES HARRINGTON , KENNETH CAMERON , JAMIE BOYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SOUTHWEST MERCER COUNTY REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv01677
Plaintiff:
TALIEA ROBINSON
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST MERCER COUNTY REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINGARD v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv01500
Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. WINGARD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARBOUR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv01291
Plaintiff:
GARY W. BARBOUR
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , JAMES DONIS, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
