Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HIPPIETOWN, LLC v. SCHMIDT et al
as 2:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
HIPPIETOWN, LLC
Defendant:
DET. MICHAEL SCHMIDT, JUDGE GINA R JOYCE, CARLA BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HIPPIETOWN, LLC et al v. SCHMIDT et al
as 2:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
HIPPIETOWN, LLC and JOSHUA BOONE
Defendant:
DET. MICHAEL SCHMIDT, JUDGE GINA R JOYCE, CARLA BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KINNARD v. COMFORT INN et al
as 2:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
CARLA KINNARD
Defendant:
COMFORT INN and CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
ORNDORF v. FYE et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
CARLA ORNDORF
Defendant:
SHAWN FYE, AUSTIN MILLER, DOUGLAS CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MADER et al v. UNION TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv01138
Defendant:
GARY SWEAT, KRIS BOCKSTOCE, HEATHER DAERR and others
Plaintiff:
CARLA M. MADER, MIECZYSLAW GNIADEK, MARTIN E. MADER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRAWFORD v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
ANDREA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , CORIZON, INC. , ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS-VINING v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
CARLA DAVIS-VINING
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE - FOREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
