Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
MOLSON v. DISANTIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant: MARCEL MALLORY, JUDGE JOHN GAHART, MARK SAUDER and others
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOLSON v. SANDRICK et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Defendant: BRIAN D. SANDRICK, CHRISTOPHER MACKENDRICK, EARNEST J. DISANDRICK, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01521
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
REESE et al v. JACOBOWITZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01523
Plaintiff: TAMARA REESE , JEREMY REESE and FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Defendant: WILLIAM JACOBOWITZ , RIFKIE JACOBOWITZ and EARNEST MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00241
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
EARNEST et al v. KING et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00738
Plaintiff: CHARLENE EARNEST , ROBERT STOUGH and ROBERT STOUGH, JR.
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER W. KING , MICHAEL GREEN and THE BOROUGH OF JEFFERSON HILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALPHA FINANCIAL MORTGAGE, INC. et al v. BAUGH et al
as 2:2009cv00385
Plaintiff: ALPHA FINANCIAL MORTGAGE, INC., BROWNSVILLE GROUP LTD., EARNEST E. LIGGETT and others
Defendant: DONALD A. BAUGH, BROWNSVILLE AREA REVITALIZATION CORPORATION, ANDREW P. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
EARNEST v. JUDGE CARSON V. BROWN
as 3:2008cv00014
Plaintiff: GREG W. EARNEST
Defendant: JUDGE CARSON V. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?