Cases 1 - 10 of 151
BECKWORTH v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BECKWORTH
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, OFFICER HALIE ELIZABETH HOUK, OFFICER ANDREW OROURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murarik v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JODY MURARIK
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Fraser Blake, Scott Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SHELIGA v. WINDBER BOROUGH et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHELIGA and Michael John Sheliga
Defendant:
WINDBER BOROUGH, WARDEN BRIAN MILLER and DANIEL SCHRADER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER-BELL v. HALL et al
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
CHERYL ANN MILLER-BELL
Defendant:
SARA HALL, REVEREND MICHAEL GESTRICH, SHAWNA WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
