Cases 11 - 20 of 74
ROBINSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, KAREN FEATHERS, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON v. NAJI et al
as 3:2020cv00222
Defendant:
DR. JAY COWAN and DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI
Plaintiff:
SAVOY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON v. TESTA et al
as 1:2020cv00263
Defendant:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE KATHY DAHLKEMPER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NICK TESTA and WARDEN KEVIN SUTTER
Plaintiff:
JAKWARIS ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. LT. BASHOR et al
as 1:2020cv00130
Defendant:
SGT, SEELINGER, LT. BASHOR, TAYLOR ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
HARPER
Plaintiff:
ROBINSON
Petitioner:
TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON and TODD ANTHONY GLOVER
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVERETT v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
EVERETT and JENKINS EVERETT
Defendant:
ROBINSON, CO 3 IRWIN, CO 1 ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. CO 1 ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
CO 3 IRWIN, CO 1 ROBINSON, CO 2 MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
JENKINS EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Petitioner:
MARCO ROBINSON, DONALD QUEER, ABEL ALEJO and others
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, GOVERNOR TOM WOLF, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2019cv00096
Defendant:
ALAN ROBINSON, THERON R. PEREZ, JOHN E. TUTTLE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON v. BLAIR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
RASHAM ROBINSON
Defendant:
Z. STITT, Warden ABBEY TATE and BLAIR COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
