Cases 11 - 20 of 46
WALLACE v. OBERLANDER et al.
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT D. OBERLANDER, E. DEPUTY MONGELLOZZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DILTS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. DILTS
Defendant:
C/O BOB BROWN, C/O RESTLER, SGT. STEVE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. THORNLEY et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CASEY THORNLEY, PATRICK NAGLE, DEANNA DELLATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. USA
as 2:2022cv01277
Petitioner:
ERICK ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FILL v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00252
Petitioner:
RICHARD ALEXANDER FILL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GATTA v. USA
as 2:2020cv01584
Petitioner:
LANDON ALEXANDER GATTA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DRIVER v. WALTON et al
as 2:2020cv01052
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUISEPPE BARBIERE, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE LOWTHER, WARDEN WALTON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DRIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VARGAS BRITO v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
as 3:2020cv00029
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT(S)
Petitioner:
LUIS ALEXANDER VARGAS BRITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, DR. KROSS, MS. BLAKELY and others
Plaintiff:
SAM DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CLEMONS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01545
Petitioner:
JORDAN ALEXANDER CLEMONS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
