Cases 11 - 20 of 50
BRYANT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv01051
Defendant:
RN WILLIAMS, JANE DOES, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
MARLYNN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE et al
as 1:2019cv00329
Defendant:
LT. ROGER HERMANN, KATHY DAHLKEMPER, DEPUTY MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE LEON BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Petitioner:
BRYANT JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMIE LUTHER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCUTELLA v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv00168
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, AMBER CHAFFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRYANT v. WARDEN, SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2018cv01671
Petitioner:
JULIAN BRYANT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN, SCI FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2018cv00294
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY and SUPT. MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
BRYANT K. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETOFF v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PETOFF
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, GARY SEYMOUR and RONALD BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSEY v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
WESLEY A. MASSEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, D.W. BRYANT, JASON STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
BRYANT KEVIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MATHIS v. USA
as 2:2016cv00765
Petitioner:
BRYANT MATHIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
