Cases 11 - 20 of 67
YOUNG v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG and JI'HAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE J. OLIVER, DEPUTY PATRICIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ENDERS et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY E. BROWN
Defendant:
SHANE ENDERS, SGT. YOUNG and LT. DUDAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv01519
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, CHAD CUTSHALL, C.O. SCHROTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMAS v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
THORNE THOMAS
Defendant:
CO1 NEWMAN, CO1 BECKER, SGT. YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNGER v. REDDICK et al
as 2:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNGER
Defendant:
REDDICK, RAIBLE, SARVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. LOW et al
as 2:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
JUWAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
ANDREW LOW, INMATE YOUNG and CO MILLAE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDERSON v. ENGLERT et al
as 2:2021cv00620
Defendant:
KOZLOWSKI, RICHARD FITZGERALD, PENDELL and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. LAFFERTY et al
as 3:2021cv00078
Defendant:
DR. M. THOMPSON, DR. SMUCKER, KIERRA LAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2021cv00043
Petitioner:
WARREN YOUNG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PINER et al v. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Defendant:
AGENT ALBERT ADAMS, CHRISTOPHER MOSER, TERRY WALTERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. PINER and STEPHEN PINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
