Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
IZZAT-AL DOUN-BAUTH PARTY OF IRAQ, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH DIOCEASE OF PITTSBURGH, CHRIS ISLAM OF NIGERIA and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, Sr., ERNEST POOH THORTON and JAMES M. WHITEY BULGER MAFIA MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FERREIRAS v. RICE-GREGO et al
as 2:2020cv01686
Defendant:
CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, RN CARTER, RN MARK JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FERREIRAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EVERETT v. BOGARDUS
as 1:2020cv00294
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BOGARDUS
Plaintiff:
JENKINS EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JENKINS v. KRASNER
as 1:2020cv00287
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LARRY KRASNER
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EVERETT v. BOGARDUS et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
LT. BOGARDUS and COI ROTTENHOUSE
Plaintiff:
JENKINS EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JENKINS v. MARSH et al
as 3:2020cv00158
Respondent:
GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, CHARLES EHRLICH, LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EVERETT v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
EVERETT and JENKINS EVERETT
Defendant:
ROBINSON, CO 3 IRWIN, CO 1 ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERETT v. CO 1 ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
CO 3 IRWIN, CO 1 ROBINSON, CO 2 MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
JENKINS EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
