Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SUTTON v. BONGIVENGO
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE SUTTON, Jr.
Defendant:
JOHN D. BONGIVENGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
JANIIS MATHIS and LAWRENCE MICHAELS
Defendant:
JOHN CARNEY, CLAIRE DEMATTE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SUTTON v. CLARK
as 1:2019cv00214
Petitioner:
JOHN D. SUTTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SUTTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Petitioner:
JOHN D. SUTTON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOSTOWSKY v. USA
as 2:2013cv01613
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN D. WOSOTOWSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv00651
Petitioner:
JOHN D. WILSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MINCH v. ABBOTT et al
as 2:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. MINCH
Defendant:
VALERIE ABBOTT and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MINCH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv00557
Petitioner:
JOHN D. MINCH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and JEFFREY A. MANNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPADY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01599
Plaintiff:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LAURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN D. SCHAFFER, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SORRENTINO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNA. et al
as 2:2008cv01484
Petitioner:
JOHN D. SORRENTINO
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNA. and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
