Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROGERS v. LEMASTER
as 1:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent:
Warden David Lemaster and WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WHITAKER v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
SCI-FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv01208
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY and PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALLEN v. SANFORD et al
as 2:2021cv00899
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALLEN v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAYO v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
SERGEANT MCCLELLAND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER ROGERS and UNIT MANAGER TIMOTHY LITTLE
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RICHARDS v. HOUGHTON et al
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant:
LT. ROGER HERMANN, LT. MICHAEL BOGANICS, KEVIN SUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
