Cases 11 - 20 of 41
ELLIS v. SARVER et al
as 2:2022cv01769
Plaintiff:
LAFON D. ELLIS
Defendant:
SERGENT HUNTER SARUER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JUSTIN VILLELLA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAPPEL v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY G. HAPPEL
Defendant:
WARDEN MARK BISHOP, DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL SCANNELL, NURSE ANGIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MALARIK v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00194
Defendant:
SGT. LUKEASHA TYSON, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, MULTIPLE ROVERS AND and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIDGEWAY v. SMOCK et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant:
JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MIKE EDWARDS, RNS, COI HALL and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE RIDGEWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEUSCHEN v. JANE DOE et al
as 2:2019cv01119
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER JOHN DOE, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and SUPERINTENDANT JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LEUSCHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOYE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 2:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCHWARTZ v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
PRICE, JUDGE TONY A OSMAN, C/O BROW and others
Plaintiff:
AUBURN COLETTE SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOSKINS v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 2:2019cv00027
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK and ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN M. HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YATES v. SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
KEITH MARCELL YATES
Defendant:
SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DIPIETRO v. WETZEL, et al
as 3:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
NICODEMO DIPIETRO
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL MIENERT, RANDLE PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
