Cases 21 - 30 of 30
JACKSON v. N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F et al
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
JARRON DARVEZ JACKSON
Defendant:
N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F, CITY OF EVANSTON, CITY OF ERIE BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOKINDA v. JIN et al
as 2:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, MICHELLE DIGGS, IRMA VIHLIDAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WYLIE-BIGGS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WYLIE-BIGGS
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, WILLIAM EMERICK, JESSE ANDRASCIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. CORIZON HEALTH CARE et al
as 2:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ORTIZ
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH CARE, SUSAN MYERS, ERIC BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASKINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ALLEN HASKINS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. LANE
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
LEE STEWART
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH CARE, INC., STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ARTIS v. JIN et al
as 2:2013cv01226
Plaintiff:
IVES T. ARTIS
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN and CORIZON HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
CHAKA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID A. HUNTER, C.O. ARNONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBEL v. CORIZON HEALTH INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
SHAWN AARON HOBEL
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC., ROSEN and MARK HAMMERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
