Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ATKINSON v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv01187
Petitioner:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON
Respondent:
JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
KNAPP et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2010cv01429
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. KNAPP and DIANE S. KNAPP
Defendant:
DOUGLAS ADAMS, KIM CLEMENTS, MICHELLE POLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGNELLO v. PAPE et al
as 2:2010cv00870
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH S. AGNELLO
Defendant:
PETER P. PAPE, JR., LARRY J. STRATIFF, JEFFERSON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLIGAN v. GULF STREAM COACH, INC.
as 2:2010cv00753
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. MILLIGAN
Defendant:
GULF STREAM COACH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
POOLE v. MARKS et al
as 2:2010cv00722
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA POOLE
Defendant:
FRANK MARKS, ROBERT C WYDA, SEAM MCGRAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00049
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
DEPPENBROOK et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
PAUL DEPPENBROOK, ED ANTHONSEN, JOHN E. ATKINSON and others
Defendant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
