Cases 21 - 30 of 36
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JEREMY STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA), SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JOHNSON v. SEVEN SPRINGS RESORT
as 3:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
JAY JOHNSON
Defendant:
SEVEN SPRINGS RESORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HERMAN et al v. SEVEN SPRINGS FARM, INC.
as 2:2012cv00701
Plaintiff:
MARIE E. HERMAN and FRANK HERMAN
Defendant:
SEVEN SPRINGS FARM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and SEVEN SPRINGS FARM, INC.
Defendant:
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
