Cases 31 - 40 of 56
MILLER v. HARTWELL et al
as 1:2019cv00339
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER SANTOS, JERRI SMOCK, PAUL ENNIS and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN L. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01338
Defendant:
MICHAEL HICE, ROBERT GILMORE, DR. AUTHOR SANTOS and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN J. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OBERMEIER v. MORENO-RIVERA et al
as 3:2018cv00183
Defendant:
EM TRANSPORT & SON, INC. and SANTOS T. MORENO-RIVERA
Plaintiff:
BAILEY E. OBERMEIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
WETZEL, HALLIGAN, STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYE v. SCI CAMP HILL PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
SCI CAMP HILL PRISON, HOLY SPIRIT HOSPIT, GRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, CARL KELDIE, VALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITENIGHT v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WHITENIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
