Cases 41 - 50 of 57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HANSELMAN
as 2:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRAD R. HANSELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
GREENE v. CRAFTON, HOLDINGS et al
as 2:2012cv01747
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA GREENE
Defendant:
CRAFTON, HOLDINGS and BRAD SOMMERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANKNEY v. WAKEFIELD et al
as 2:2010cv01290
Plaintiff:
BRAD ANKNEY
Defendant:
BARBARA WAKEFIELD and ATHENA PETROLIAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEVINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2010cv00193
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAD NEVINS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAVIS v. VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2009cv01504
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant:
VALDEZ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAURIE HULL-ENGLES, KATHERINE TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LAWTON et al v. ADVANCED INFUSION, INC et al
as 2:2009cv01197
Plaintiff:
DONNA J. LAWTON and BRAD LAWTON
Defendant:
ADVANCED INFUSION, INC, ABBOTT LABORATORIES and HOSPIRA, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEASON v. PALAKOVICH et al
as 1:2009cv00192
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JAMEEL BEASON
Respondent:
JOHN A. PALAKOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BRAD FOULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NICHOLS v. ASTRUE et al
as 2:2009cv00839
Plaintiff:
BRAD A. NICHOLS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. F&W, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00536
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., ESTATE OF TYRONE G. KERSEY, STATE ONE MUSIC AMERICA LLC and others
Defendant:
F&W, INC. and LOUIS J. GRIPPO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MCKOUEN et al v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2008mc00265
Plaintiff:
BRAD MCKOUEN and DELTA STAFFING LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
