Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
AL-TAMIMI v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv00209
Plaintiff: MAJEED MOLSSON AL-TAMIMI
Defendant: ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
GONZALEZ v. MR. MIKE MILLWARD
as 3:2007cv00187
Petitioner: MANUEL A. GONZALEZ
Respondent: MR. MIKE MILLWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KOURKLINSKI v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv00926
Plaintiff: ANDREI K. KOURKLINSKI
Defendant: ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
GUNDUZ v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00780
Plaintiff: KADIR GUNDUZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
GONZALEZ-LUNA et al v. SWIHART et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00406
Plaintiff: BENITO GONZALEZ-LUNA, BENITO GONZALEZ-LUNA, BENITO GONZALEZ-LUNA and others
Defendant: JANET SWIHART and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZHU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv00172
Plaintiff: TONG ZHU
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, PAUL NOVAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GERSHENZON v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2007cv00109
Plaintiff: MIKHAIL GERSHENZON
Defendant: EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and ALBERTO R. GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZHOU v. NOVAK et al
as 2:2007cv00010
Plaintiff: XUHUI ZHOU
Defendant: PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?