Cases 41 - 50 of 56
DANDAR v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2011cv00112
Petitioner:
RONALD DANDAR
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSEPH MASSA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRABENSTEIN v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00467
Plaintiff:
GERI GRABENSTEIN
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BROUSE v. ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORP.
as 3:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROUSE
Defendant:
ROBERT BOSCH TOOL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TDY INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED v. INGERSOLL CUTTING TOOL COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00790
Plaintiff:
TDY INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
INGERSOLL CUTTING TOOL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MAX CO, LTD. v. PENNTECH INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
as 2:2009cv01620
Plaintiff:
MAX CO, LTD.
Defendant:
PENNTECH INDUSTRIAL TOOLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
MCGUANE v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC
as 2:2009cv01226
Plaintiff:
GERALD MCGUANE
Defendant:
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRAWFORD v. TRI-TECH MOLDING et al
as 1:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
TRI-TECH MOLDING and HYTECH TOOL & DESIGN CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
KENNAMETAL INC. v. SANDVIK, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00857
Plaintiff:
KENNAMETAL INC.
Defendant:
SANDVIK, INC., SECO TOOLS INC and WALTER USA, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
THOMPSON et al v. WYRKS TOOL & MACHINE LTD. et al
as 2:2009cv00581
Plaintiff:
LOUIS D. THOMPSON and HEIDI L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
WYRKS TOOL & MACHINE LTD. and KITCAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
INNOVATIVE CARBIDE, INC. v. TOOL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2009cv00271
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE CARBIDE, INC.
Defendant:
TOOL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
