Cases 81 - 90 of 401
GAYDOS v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01596
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. GAYDOS, JR. and LISA A. GAYDOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REAVIS v. BURKOVICH et al
as 2:2020cv01377
Respondent:
PAUL AURANDT, JAROD ANKROM, BURKOVICH and others
Petitioner:
ACEY REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01284
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL OFFICE, SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY and others
Petitioner:
ACEY REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GOODMAN v. MICELI et al
as 2:2020cv01259
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, BETH RUDZIEMSKI, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE I. GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KASS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01099
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LISA KASS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
EASLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN VETZEL, ERNIE MANGELUZZO, DR. WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EASLEY v. OPERLANDER et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TABE BICKELL, DR. WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
