Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LOPEZ MARTINEZ v. LECHLEITNER et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
JUAN MIGUEL LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PATRICK "P.J." LECHLEITNER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
UNION INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROCKERZ, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
UNION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROCKERZ, INC., JAKAMIEN JAJUAN MILLER, CHRISTIAN ORTEGA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
FIGUEROA-LOPEZ v. HERBIC
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
GERMAN FIGUEROA-LOPEZ
Defendant:
DR. HERBIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL et al v. HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
NICOLE ROYAL, BENJAMIN REEVE, JENNIFER RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., HARVEST 2017, INC., HARVEST 2051, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CONLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. CONLEY, ANGELA SCUNZIANO, PAUL ROHAN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOPEZ v. THE HOME DEPOT
as 2:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LOPEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01781
Defendant:
MARTIN F. HORN, JEFFREY A. BEARD and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
GEORGE I. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
