Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MOJICA-MENDOZA v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
DELMIS MOJICA-MENDOZA
Respondent:
FCI LORETTO WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MENDOZA et al v. WEST VIEW WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Higinio Mendoza, Jr and KAREN FEITT
Defendant:
WEST VIEW WATER AUTHORITY, JORDAN TAX SERVICE, INC., BOROUGH OF AVALON PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOJICA-MENDOZA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
DELMIS MOJICA-MENDOZA
Respondent:
WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MENDOZA v. THE DOUBLE TREE BY HILTON et al
as 2:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
RYAN DARIO MENDOZA
Defendant:
THE DOUBLE TREE BY HILTON, MANAGER JOHN DOE, DIRECTOR OF GUEST JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
