Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CHESHER et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
SHANE CHESTER, JOANNE M. KING, ANDREW NOSBISCH and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSEWOOD FARMS COUNTRY GIFTS, LLC v. CHRIS BEERS VENTURES LLC
as 2:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
ROSEWOOD FARMS COUNTRY GIFTS, LLC
Defendant:
CHRIS BEERS VENTURES LLC doing business as GRANDPA JOE'S CANDY SHOP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
MAIN STREET AMERICA ASSURANCE COMPANY v. WEASENFORTH et al
as 2:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
MAIN STREET AMERICA ASSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CANDY WEASENFORTH, JUSTIN JAY WEASENFORTH and BARRY WEASENFORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SEALE v. ANNUITY FYI et al
as 2:2019cv01146
Defendant:
LIFE FUNDING OPTIONS, KATE SNYDER, UPSTATE LAW GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. SEALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAS M. SLEDD COMPANY v. TRIANGLE CANDY & TOBACCO COMAPNY, INC.
as 2:2018mc00756
Plaintiff:
CHAS M. SLEDD COMPANY
Defendant:
TRIANGLE CANDY & TOBACCO COMAPNY, INC., SCOTT FRANKEL and SHELLY FRANKEL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DECARLO
as 3:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CANDY M. DECARLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
