Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
GRAVES v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00243
Petitioner: KANE CONRAD GRAVES
Respondent: WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff: JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. OVERMYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff: MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Defendant: MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JOHN W. SAWTELLE, DEREK F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIELEWICZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff: CONRAD C. BIELEWICZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
RAMBERT v. WETZEL, et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Plaintiff: ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, SHEILA MOORE-SMEAL, RENEE FOULDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONRAD v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 3:2016mc00030
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. CONRAD
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
BIELEWICZ v. WALT et al
as 1:2016cv00180
Plaintiff: CONRAD C. BIELEWICZ
Defendant: MICHAEL J. WALT, D.O., DIANE KENGERSKY, PA-C and TRISHA WRIGHT, R.N.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00565
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00326
Plaintiff: CONRAD CLINTON BLAIR
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff: HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant: KATHLEEN G. KANE, DANIEL P. BURNS, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?