Cases 1 - 10 of 33
CNX RESOURCES CORPORATION et al v. Hoffman
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
CNX RESOURCES CORPORATION and CNX GAS COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
Dawson Hoffman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DAWSON v. USA
as 2:2023cv01518
Petitioner:
DORIAN DAWSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAWSON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-ALBION et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
John David Dawson
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Albion and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. SCI-Albion et al
as 3:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
John David Dawson
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Albion and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REARDON et al v. LINCOLN EASTERN MANAGEMENT CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
KAREN REARDON and LOUIS REARDON
Defendant:
LINCOLN EASTERN MANAGEMENT CORP. and DAWSON-SUNCAP SHV, LLC individually and trading and doing business as THE ASHBY AT SOUTH HILLS VILLAGE STATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAWSON v. MR. LATTENER et al
as 3:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
ARTEMUS DAWSON
Defendant:
MR. LATTENER, MS. PEASE, DR. NIEGI M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAWSON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00172
Petitioner:
DERRICK DAWSON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN I DOE, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00353
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN DOE #1, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
