Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JAMES v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, MICHEAL OVERMYER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
NAQUAN BARNES
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KIBE v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv01405
Petitioner:
GLENN R. KIBE
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WRIGHT v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
JAMES OSCAR WRIGHT
Defendant:
DEBRA SAUERS, ERIC TICE, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. SAUERS et al
as 2:2012cv01218
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LATIK MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, II, GILL, D.J. ROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINDELL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, DAVID PICKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. BARONE et al
as 1:2011cv00256
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARONE, DEBRA SAUERS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
