Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
INNOVATIVE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. INNOVATION WORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01385
Plaintiff: INNOVATIVE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and DONALD B. JONES
Defendant: INNOVATION WORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DENNIS M DAVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LITTLE v. THE BOROUGH OF GREENVILLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01268
Plaintiff: NANCY LITTLE
Defendant: THE BOROUGH OF GREENVILLE, BRIAN W. SHIPLEY, PAMELA S. AUCHTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. v. BUSBY et al
as 2:2012mc00192
Plaintiff: SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant: DONALD B. BUSBY, DEANNA DAVIS, ROBERT G. RONK and others
CENTER FOR FIDUCIARY STUDIES, LLC et al v. FOUNDATION FOR FIDUCIARY STUDIES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00919
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR FIDUCIARY STUDIES, LLC
Counter Defendant: FIDUCIARY ANALYTICS, LLC and FIDUCIARY 360, L.P.
Defendant: FOUNDATION FOR FIDUCIARY STUDIES and DONALD B. TRONE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ZAYCOSKY v. FIA CARD SERVICES, NA et al
as 2:2008cv00719
Plaintiff: DONALD B. ZAYCOSKY
Defendant: FIA CARD SERVICES, NA, MANN BRACKEN, LLC and NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01537
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
MCCANN v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2007cv00245
Petitioner: DONALD B. MCCANN
Respondent: MARILYN S. BROOKS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF YORK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?