Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCDOWELL v. EQUIFAX, INC.
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E MCDOWELL
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DORN v. BUDWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES DEAN and THOMAS JAMES DORN
Defendant:
MARISSA BUDWICK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OTHER UNNAMED FBI AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WASHINGTON v. CHATHAM UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2017cv01401
Plaintiff:
CUMMIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CHATHAM UNIVERSITY, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WHIPPER et al v. EQUIFAX INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
LESLIE WHIPPER and ROBERTA SERAFINE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INC. and EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ZOKAITES v. TRANSUNION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00981
Plaintiff:
FRANK R. ZOKAITES
Defendant:
TRANSUNION CORPORATION , EQUIFAX, INC. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTS v. EQUIFAX, INC.
as 2:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
KORRY D. PITTS
Defendant:
EQUIFAX, INC. and EQUIFAX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
