Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
DANA FREDRICK BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
JOSEPH K. WILLIAMS d/b/a HONORABLE JOSEPH K. WILLIAMS, ERIN KING d/b/a Probation Officer, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv01228
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BROOKS
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DAVID ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CRUZ v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 2:2021cv00723
Defendant:
BAILIFFS, PITTSBURGH POLICE, SHERIFFS; CLERKS, DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM (JUNIOR) CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GINYARD v. DEL-PRETE et al
as 2:2020cv01947
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, LOUIS DEL-PRETE and LAURA K. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GINYARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
MAJOR SMITH, DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS and ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
ERIC L FARRAR, JR and LEONARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALKER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00021
Petitioner:
RAYMOND WALKER
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILEY v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00019
Petitioner:
CLAUDE WILEY, JR.
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
O'CONNOR v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00020
Petitioner:
ARIAN O'CONNOR
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PACELY v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv00344
Defendant:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
JAMIE D. PACELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
