Cases 1 - 10 of 316
Hice et al v. EQT COPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
David Hice, Joseph Moore and Christina Barlow
Defendant:
EQT COPORATION, EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY and BEUSA HOLDINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MOORE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
MEGAN MOORE
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOORE v. SARVER et al
as 2:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
LESTER MOORE
Defendant:
ROBERT SARVER and SERGEANT GULLISPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Respondent:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, KERI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
