Cases 1 - 10 of 364
CORDER v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Defendant:
P. THOMAS, JOHN DOE 1, MR DUBISH and others
Plaintiff:
MANASSEH NASA CORDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNGARD v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01292
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
Mr KEVIN L. BUNGARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
ALLEN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, SCI GREENE, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JACK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ARKETT et al v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01122
Defendant:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
MS. VIRGINIA NICKELS and MR JAMES ARKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LOCKETT v. BLAKE et al
as 2:2024cv01105
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK and Mr. Blake
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POSEY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Defendant:
MR. PEACOCK, MR. YOUNG, MR. QUICK and others
Plaintiff:
AJANI POSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MILLS et al
as 2:2024cv01062
Respondent:
MR. ADAM BISHOP and JUDGE BETH MILLS
Petitioner:
ANTHONY D. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MURPHY v. MEDLIN et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. MURPHY
Defendant:
DEBBIE HAWKENBERRY, LAUREL HARRY, MS. JEFFERIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00114
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
