Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JONES v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and DIVISION OF LABORATORIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. I.R.S.
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
I.R.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, SCI SOMERSET and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2019cv00871
Respondent:
SCI SOMERSET, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv00472
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
D. OVERMYER and K. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00771
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, KARL WILLIAMS and LORENZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC et al v. FERRA et al
as 2:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Defendant:
FRANK JAMES FERRA and PAUL JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ARISTA RECORDS LLC. et al
as 2:2008cv01325
Plaintiff:
ARISTA RECORDS LLC., ZOMBA RECORDING LLC., UMG RECORDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant:
PAUL JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2008cv01266
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
R. SHANNON, THOM CORBETT and ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
