Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
SWIFT v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
ZAMAR BER SWIFT
Respondent:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWIFT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
DONNIE JAVON SWIFT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN EDWARD WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT DEREK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEITH v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION TRUCKING COMPANY ET AL
as 3:2021cv00098
Defendant:
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC D/B/A SWIFT TRANSPORTATION TRUCKING CO., SWIFT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC D/B/A SWIFT TRANSPORTATION TRUCKING CO. and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION TRUCKING COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNYDER et al v. BOWMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00630
Plaintiff:
GERALD SNYDER and JUDY SNYDER
Defendant:
DERRICK W. BOWMAN and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUHAMMAD v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, TREVOR WINGARD, MARK I. BERNSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
