Cases 61 - 70 of 25,230
Carroll v. Greenwood County
as 8:2024cv04797
Plaintiff:
Demarucs Carroll
Defendant:
Greenwood County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Gilbert v. Grant et al
as 6:2024cv03912
Plaintiff:
Dominic Javon Gilbert
Defendant:
Quandara Grant, Castran Aiken, Latasha Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Warren v. USA
as 4:2024cv04834
Petitioner:
Robert Anton Warren
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Benson v. Janson
as 0:2024cv04841
Respondent:
Warden Jansen, FCI Edgefield and Warden Janson
Petitioner:
Rahshjeem Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clea, Jr. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv04847
Plaintiff:
Glenn Clea, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyler v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv04137
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hudson
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leake v. Faison et al
as 2:2024cv04008
Defendant:
the Town of Summerville, Officer Dillon M. Faison and the Summerville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Tony Leake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harris et al v. Van-Pelt et al
as 6:2024cv03864
Defendant:
Robert William Van-Pelt, III, Laurens City Police Department, Heath Copeland and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph B Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Eberhart v. Officer et al
as 3:2024cv03896
Defendant:
Police Officer and Columbia Police Department
Plaintiff:
Nevelle Joshua Eberhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown v. Anderson County Swat Team
as 8:2024cv04730
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dwayne Brown
Defendant:
Anderson County Swat Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
