Cases 151 - 160 of 956
Hatcher v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections and Sullivan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akil v. Locky et al
as 4:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ajani Shomari Akil
Defendant:
Tim Locky, Austin Swing, Eugene Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Johnson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
George P Ford
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Department and Mike Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Ball
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00357
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Gerald McCallister and Craig Julian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Correct Health Inc., Teresa Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatley v. Simerly et al
as 2:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hatley
Defendant:
Jonhathan Brooks Simerly and Carter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
Blaine Edward Williams
Defendant:
Cocke County, Cocke County Sheriff's Office, Tommy Large and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cash v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Sage Andrew Cash
Defendant:
Autumn Armstrong, Donna Carter, Butch Gallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murchison v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Christ Jermaine Murchison
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail, Sullivan County Jail Medical and Doctor Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
