Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Johnson et al v. Blinken et al
as 4:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson and Volha Aleksandrovna Borys
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken, Rena Bitter, Mark Brzezinski and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. University Health System, Inc
as 3:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
University Health System, Inc. dba The University of Tennessee Medical Center and University Health System, Inc. doing business as The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Doe v. Rausch (JRG3)
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rausch
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cochran v. eMortgage Lending, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Cochran
Defendant:
eMortgage Lending, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe v. Rausch
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Byron Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pitner et al
as 3:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Thomas J. Pitner and John Doe Entity dba MTM's Bar
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schilke et al v. First National Bank of Oneida et al (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00528
Plaintiff:
Benton Lawson, Richard Schilke, Annette Lawson and others
Defendant:
Mark Kline, James L. Cotton, Jr., Allyn M. Lay, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
