Cases 141 - 150 of 5,392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Loudon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
Loudon County Sheriff's Department and Jimmy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kuntz et al v. Wray
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kuntz
Defendant:
Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Doe #023 et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Defendant:
John Doe #023, Governor William B Lee and Director David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ward v. Shelbyville Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Casey L Ward
Defendant:
Shelbyville Police Department and Michael W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #023 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Doe #023
Defendant:
Governor William B Lee, Director David B. Rausch, William B Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #022 v. Lee
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Doe #022
Defendant:
Governor William B Lee, Director David B. Rausch, William B Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
