Cases 261 - 270 of 5,431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCurry et al v. Mccurry et al
as 2:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry and Etha Jones
Defendant:
Benjamin Curtis Mccurry, Gary McCurry, Cindy McCurry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Greater Chattanooga Coalition for Private Property Rights v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Greater Chattanooga Coalition for Private Property Rights
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
J. Cumby Construction, Inc. v. Knoxville Utilities Board et al
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
J. Cumby Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Knoxville Utilities Board, Daniel J Kembel, John Piotrowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Layne v. Sanders
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Laura Layne
Defendant:
Brenda Marie Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
