Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Jones v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stephen Jones
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Correction, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kentron Maclin, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Mike Parris, Steve Jones, Stacey Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Mays
as 3:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
Lemaricus Devall Davidson
Respondent:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Terry Huffman, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Lee, David Rausch, James Berrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Carmon et al
as 2:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Gilliam
Defendant:
Carmon, John Dugger, Butch Gallan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hempstead v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams, Steven Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March v. TDOC et al
as 3:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Octaivian March and Octaivian Demetrius Reeves
Defendant:
TDOC, Sgt Tim Carrell, H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00408
Plaintiff:
Daniel Austin Duke
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Mike Parris, Alan Bunch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mudd v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
William Mudd
Defendant:
Loudon County, Jake Keener, Deputy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Avery Sarten
Defendant:
Buddy Bradshaw, Henry J Cullen, Julia C Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
