Cases 151 - 160 of 27,708
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suggs v. Dewberry et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jesse Suggs
Defendant:
Wendy Dewberry, Kayla Smith and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Coggins et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jessica Barber
Defendant:
Brandon Coggins, GSP Transportation, Inc. and UM Geico Insurance
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Taylor v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Barbara Taylor
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colbaugh v. Meigs County et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Defendant:
Meigs County, Meigs County Sheriff's Department, Robert Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Joy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
James J. Joy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
