Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes v. USA
as 3:2017cv00056
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wyttenbach v. Tennessee Supreme Court et al
as 3:2016cv00704
Petitioner:
William Hayes Wyttenbach
Respondent:
Tennessee Supreme Court, Tennessee Court of Appeals, Tennessee Davidson County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Hamilton County Government et al
as 1:2016cv00293
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government , Corrections Corporation Of America, Inc. , Daniel Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Michelle Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. USA
as 3:2016cv00401
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hayes v. Hamilton County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hayes
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff's Department and Ty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abernathy v. Hayes
as 1:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Abernathy
Defendant:
Leslie Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen et al v. Summit Investment Management LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Gregg A Hansen , Over Easy Number VII, L.P. and Over Easy Number VIII, L.P.
Defendant:
Summit Investment Management LLC, SummitBridge Credit Investments, II, LLC, SBC II REO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Knox County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff Office, Knox County, Harold Hayes Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
